— Every Scale of Capital
One property. One hundred. One standard, unaltered by either.
P&A was not built to serve a single tier of capital wearing the clothing of the others. The landlord with one three-bedroom house and the institution allocating across a national programme receive the same depth of attention, the same rigour of assessment, and the same standard of execution, because the proposition itself, statutorily-underwritten, demographically inevitable, does not change shape according to the size of the cheque behind it.
— Every Scale
From a single asset to a national programme, without a change in register.
The scale of a client's holding determines the shape of the engagement. It does not determine its quality.
The Individual Landlord
A single property, assessed with precisely the same rigour we would bring to the first asset in a hundred-unit programme.
1 PropertyThe Small Portfolio Holder
A handful of properties held privately, typically the point at which diversification beyond standard tenancy first becomes worth serious consideration.
2–10 UnitsThe Regional Portfolio
A concentrated holding across a defined geography, often the natural constituency for phased, sequential conversion.
10–50 UnitsThe Multi-Unit National Portfolio
Holdings spanning multiple regions, requiring coordination across a correspondingly wider set of local authorities and planning jurisdictions.
50–100+ UnitsThe Institutional Allocation
Capital deployed under a formal mandate, sized and structured to the standards institutional governance requires.
Programme-Scale— Every Class of Capital
Twelve categories of client. One point of entry.
The following is not an exhaustive schedule but a representative account of the capital P&A is built to serve.
Private Capital
Individual & Private Landlords
The owner of one property or a small, privately held portfolio, for whom this may represent the first meaningful diversification beyond standard tenancy.
Family Offices & Private Investment Offices
Capital managed on behalf of a single family or a small number of principals, typically seeking long-duration, low-volatility allocations of exactly this character.
Personal Holding Companies
Corporate structures acting for private principals, for whom the statutory underwriting of this asset class offers a defensible, generationally-minded allocation.
Institutional Capital
Institutional Investors & Corporate Landlords
Established property-holding institutions seeking to diversify existing residential exposure into a regulated, contracted-income asset class.
REITs & Listed Property Companies
Real Estate Investment Trusts and listed vehicles for whom sector and income diversification carries direct relevance to shareholder reporting.
Pension Fund Property Divisions
Long-horizon capital for which statutorily-underwritten, publicly-funded income is a natural and increasingly sought-after complement to existing holdings.
Alternative Capital
Hedge Fund Managers
Allocators seeking real-asset exposure genuinely decorrelated from the conditions that move open-market residential property.
Private Equity Real Estate Partners
Sponsors for whom a scalable, replicable conversion model offers a genuine platform thesis rather than a single opportunistic transaction.
Sovereign Wealth Funds
Sovereign capital for which duration, statutory underwriting and demographic inevitability are not novel considerations but familiar, deliberate ones.
Sector-Adjacent
Property Development & Portfolio Holding Firms
Organisations already engaged in residential development or portfolio management, for whom this represents an adjacent and complementary use case.
Sector-Adjacent
Housing Associations
Registered providers already operating within regulated accommodation, for whom the operational logic of this asset class is already familiar territory.
Sector-Adjacent
Registered Charities & Benevolent Funds
Charitable capital for which mission alignment and financial sustainability are not competing objectives but, properly structured, complementary ones.
— The Governing Principle
A single landlord with one property and an institution allocating across a hundred are, to us, the same conversation held at a different scale. Neither is a lesser version of the other. Neither is treated as such.
— No Client Is Identical
We do not propose a solution before we understand the question.
Two landlords holding an identical property, in an identical location, will frequently require entirely different recommendations, because the property was never the only variable.
Individual assessment, not a standard template
Every engagement begins with a review of the client's specific circumstances: the property or portfolio itself, the client's capital position, their appetite for direct operational involvement against a wholly passive structure, their timeline, and their tolerance for the regulatory processes described elsewhere on this site. No two clients receive an identical proposal on the strength of an identical property.
A proposed way forward, not a prescribed one
The outcome of that assessment is a considered recommendation, not a predetermined package. Where conversion is not the right answer for a particular client or a particular property, we say so plainly, since a client poorly matched to this asset class serves neither their interests nor ours.
— How We Are Engaged
Five tiers of client. Five corresponding packages. Fees follow the structure selected, never the reverse.
Each package corresponds directly to the scale at which a client holds property, set out earlier on this page. The fee basis attached to each is not arbitrary; it reflects the genuinely different economics of advising on a single asset against coordinating a national programme.
Tier One — 1 Property
The Foundation Engagement
A fixed-fee instruction covering assessment, planning support and Ofsted registration guidance for a single property. The scope is defined precisely at the outset, and the fee is agreed as a single sum, not an hourly accumulation, so the individual landlord entering this asset class for the first time knows the entirety of the commitment before it is made.
Tier Two — 2–10 Units
The Portfolio Engagement
A tiered, per-property fee structure, priced to reflect the genuine efficiencies a multi-property instruction creates: shared due diligence, a single point of coordination, and a discounted rate per additional property as the portfolio under instruction grows.
Tier Three — 10–50 Units
The Regional Programme
A hybrid structure, combining a fixed retainer for ongoing programme coordination with a per-unit fee for each property brought through the pathway, suited to a portfolio concentrated across a defined geography and a corresponding set of local authorities.
Tier Four — 50–100+ Units
The National Programme
A retainer and success-fee structure, with the per-unit rate reducing at agreed thresholds as the number of properties under instruction increases, a decelerating scale common to advisory engagements of comparable size, reflecting genuine economies rather than an arbitrary discount.
Tier Five — Programme-Scale
The Institutional Mandate
A bespoke retainer, structured to institutional governance and reporting requirements from the outset, encompassing due diligence, site selection, operator partnership structuring and ongoing oversight for the life of the mandate, agreed directly with the allocating institution.
The five packages above correspond to the five tiers of scale described earlier on this page and are illustrative of the structure available, not an exhaustive or fixed price list. The specific fee basis, whether fixed, tiered, hybrid or bespoke, is proposed following the individual assessment described above, and confirmed in writing before any engagement formally begins.
— Whichever Scale You Represent
The first conversation is the same, regardless of what follows it.
A confidential review of your property or portfolio, conducted with the same rigour whether you hold one asset or one hundred.
Start the conversation →